Skip to content
VeroOCM · Oil Condition Monitoring

From oil sample to verdict in minutes.
On your own bench.

VeroOCM is the oil condition monitoring platform for on-site oil analysis: eight VeroSci at-line analyzers on one system, live test runs from the instrument, ASTM-method results with QC behind every number, and asset ratings that name the rule, the value, and the recommended action.

No mail-in lab. No waiting weeks.

VeroVis · VeroFoam · VeroOxi · VeroDry · VeroAsh · VeroRes · VeroCor · VeroCal

01THE PROBLEM

The mail-in loop is broken

Used-oil analysis has a latency problem, a pricing problem, and an alarm problem — and they compound.

3–7 d

in transit before the lab sees it

24–72 h

lab turnaround, after transit

84%

of assets in severe alarm in one published program

30–50%

ASTM D2272 reproducibility between labs — 18–33% within one

PRICING

Degradation tests (RPVOT, foam, oxidation) are $30–150 exception add-ons — ordered one-off, so nobody holds them as a time series.

STATISTICS

Statistical alarm limits need history — the leading bench platform will not compute them below 80 samples per component type. Decades at quarterly mail-in cadence.

CONSEQUENCE

So programs run static defaults — in one published program ~84% of assets sat in severe alarm, against the ~20% practitioners call manageable.

The same bottle, two loopsMail-in courier loop stretches 3–7 days in transit plus 24–72 hours in the lab on a 0–10 day axis. The at-line loop is a point on day 0 — minutes at the bench.
The same bottle, two loops
Mail-in courier loopVeroOCM at-line loop
bottlecourierlab queuePDF report
days, not minutes

3–7 d in transit, then 24–72 h in the lab — longer when bottles wait for a shipment

exception tests extra · trend starts at sample 4

your benchlive runrated verdict
minutes, at the bench

no courier, no lab queue · every run is a series point

day 0

2 d

4 d

6 d

8 d

10 d

02THE UNFAIR ADVANTAGE

We own the instrument and the software

Eight at-line analyzers, ten ASTM methods and four practices, one shared device agent, one oil analysis software platform. The instrument itself streams the run, writes its own certificate, monitors its own health, and joins a managed fleet in under ten minutes.

8at-line analyzers10ASTM methods4ASTM practices1device agent + platform
MARGINAL COST PER RUN

operator time + consumables

The exception slate becomes a weekly series — not a one-off order.

METHOD PRECISION, SAME BENCH

1.7×

ASTM D2272-22: one bench keeps you on the tighter repeatability term. Between-lab scatter goes away; method variance does not.

01

VeroVis

Kinematic viscosity · VI

D445D2270

02

VeroFoam

Foaming tendency

D892D6082

03

VeroOxi

Oxidation stability (RPVOT)

D2272

04

VeroDry

Water content

D6304

05

VeroAsh

Ash content

D482

06

VeroRes

Carbon residue

D524

07

VeroCor

Copper corrosion

D130

08

VeroCal

Heat of combustion

D240

ARCHITECTURE

One outbound port. No Windows PC.

Industrial-grade plumbing your IT department will actually approve.

  • Encrypted outbound HTTPS — the only network requirement is one open port.

  • One secure agent on every instrument; the demo runs the same software as production — they cannot drift.

  • An append-only ingest log, ordered and redelivery-safe, in a time-series store.

  • Web + native iOS and Android, live; self-hosted or cloud — sovereignty without losing the intelligence.

The lab needs exactly one thing from IT: outbound HTTPS. Everything else is managed.

04FOLLOW ONE BOTTLE

Follow one bottle, end to end

One sample, five chapters: the live run, the custody chain, the instrument’s own QC, the five evaluations behind the verdict, and the rollup your board reads. Every screen below is the real product.

05INTELLIGENCE · TRENDS & PROGNOSTICS

We recover the machine from the oil's response

06INTELLIGENCE · OIL DATA

Cited data. Honest KPIs. Readable standards.

Every number on the platform tells you where it came from.

PROVENANCE LEDGER

31 products · 6 categories

PRODUCT

PROPERTY

VALUE

SOURCE

Turbine oil · ISO VG 46

RPVOT

980 min

manufacturer PDS, cited

Hydraulic · ISO VG 68

KV40

68.2 cSt

site-measured fresh reference

beats the datasheet

Gas engine oil · SAE 40

TBN

not stated → stays empty

never interpolated

PDS INTAKE

upload

extraction

human confirm

NO SOURCE, NO ROW

the database refuses a row without a source.

Four-column provenance table. TBN is an em dash on a red-tinted band badged never interpolated — the database refuses a row without a source.

Every value cited to its data sheet; a site-measured fresh-oil reference beats the datasheet; unstated properties stay empty, never interpolated.

OVERALL LUBRICATION EFFECTIVENESS

78.4%

OLE = PClpm × PCcct × PClqt

if a term is missing, the KPI is blank with a reason — never a fabricated 100%

every KPI shows its own formula

ALARM RATE · FLEET

0.12

0.20

ceiling 0.20 — the red line

STANDARDS LIBRARY · 14 READABLE PAGES

each page links to the original at astm.org

Fourteen readable pages behind your results — what each standard measures, how the bench runs it, what it cannot tell you, and a link to the original at astm.org.

07INTELLIGENCE · THE INSTRUMENTS THEMSELVES

The platform maintains the analyzers too

VeroOxi · BATH HEAT-UP DRIFT

PLATFORM · EWMA indicator

% vs baseline

0

+24

+18

+12

+6

baseline

+18% vs baseline

ticket opened · evidence chart attached

runs

per-run result

EWMA — the indicator that fires

13 DRIFT INDICATORS

EWMA

CUSUM

threshold

duty

DRIFT CAUGHT BEFORE FAILURE

every indicator opens its ticket with the evidence chart attached.

VeroOxi bath heat-up drift, percent versus baseline. Grey per-run dots under an amber EWMA line that crosses the indicator threshold and opens a ticket.

Drift caught before failure: bath heat-up time vs baseline → ticket, days early.

30-task maintenance catalog

built from the printed manuals of all eight analyzers

21quote the manual
2cite a standard
7platform defaults
VeroDry — replace septumMANUAL

“200–250 uses” — user manual, cited

VeroVis — verify with CRMSTANDARD

per ASTM D6299 practice

VeroOxi — bath heat-up driftPLATFORM

drift indicator, evidence chart attached

Usage meters come free

Run telemetry already carries them.

cycle countsheater duty-cycle → heater-hours

A service resets both

meters → 0 · drift baseline → re-established

QC drift after a service reads as “post-maintenance bias — re-baseline?”

Plant side

sampling campaignsdue queueaction kanban
one webhook to your CMMS

08TRUST ARTIFACTS

Certificates you can verify. An audit log you can't quietly edit.

CERTIFICATE · VC-2026-000148

IMMUTABLE

Revision 1

SUPERSEDED

snapshot sha-256

9f2c4a1e77b30d58

issued 12 Aug 2026

Revision 2

CURRENT

snapshot sha-256

4b71c3a90e29d514

issued 14 Aug 2026

+1

reissue

REASON — REQUIRED

re-authentication required

“V40 transcription corrected against the instrument record.”

PUBLICLY VERIFIABLE BY HASH

ocm.verosci.com/verify/

4b71c3a90e29d514

VALID · REV 2

public verify is by content-hash prefix — not a tenant session.

Certificate VC-2026-000148: revision 1 superseded, revision 2 current after a required reason and re-authentication. Publicly verifiable by content-hash.

Certificates are immutable — a correction reissues as revision +1 with a required reason, and the prior is marked superseded.

AUDIT LOG · VERIFY CHAIN

APPEND-ONLY

each entry stores the hash of the previous one

GENESIS

prev

self

GENESIS

#1041

prev

GENESIS

self

8e33…

#1042

prev

8e33…

self

c07b…

#1043

prev

c07b…

self

≠ stored

edit detected here

“VERIFY CHAIN” REPLAYS EVERY ENTRY FROM GENESIS AND RETURNS ONE OF TWO ANSWERS

BROKEN AT SEQ #1043

reason: entry hash mismatch — content tampered.

VALID · 3,412 ENTRIES

…or none was, and it returns the head hash.

DETECTS

seq gap

prev_hash mismatch

content tampered

Append-only audit log: four linked entries, GENESIS through #1043. Entry #1043 is broken — its self hash no longer matches the stored value. Verify chain replays from genesis and returns broken-at-sequence or valid with the head hash.

Tamper-evidence, not tamper-claims: the chain names the exact entry that changed.

ALSO ON THE RECORD

report schedules

delivery subscriptions

signed-delivery log

09COMPETITION

The slot we occupy is empty

Everyone else touches the sample. We touch the instrument. On-site oil condition monitoring with ASTM-grade results in minutes is a category with one incumbent — and we beat it on architecture, QC transparency, and openness.

Capability comparison of VeroOCM against TruVu 360, EraSoft OCM, AP Connect, and mail-in portals
CAPABILITY
VERO OCM
TRUVU 360AMETEK SPECTRO
ERASOFT OCMERALYTICS
AP CONNECTANTON PAAR
MAIL-IN PORTALSPOLARIS · TESTOIL · ALS · WEARCHECK
Live instrument telemetry● 1 Hz live runs◐ device console, real time◐ remote control (RCS)✕ transfer layer only✕ analyzer sits in the lab
Cloud web UI + mobile● web + native iOS/Android● hosted cloud tier; no app published✕ Windows only✕ Windows workstation/server● portal + native apps
Instrument QC shown to user● D6299 + Westgard, gating◐ NIST-traceable check standards◐ fresh-oil reference checks○ not published◐ ISO 17025 accreditation
Statistical limits, and time to earn them● statistical limits from 6 points● D7720, at 80 samples○ reference limits only○ not published◐ regression from 4 (TestOil)
Fleet mgmt / device health● claim · health · calibration · PdM○ sold as a service contract○ not published◐ up to 100 instruments— they own the analyzers
Data ownership + open API● REST · CSV · JSON · SFTP○ no egress published◐ CSV / PDF to LIMS● REST + csv/xlsx/pdf/json● ALS open API; WearCheck REST + SFTP

● published ◐ partial ○ not published ✕ architecturally absent — not applicable

Public vendor documentation only, checked Aug 2026 — contradictory reseller pages excluded.

days → minutes

Send-away stacks 3–7 days of transit onto a 24–72 h lab turnaround. The bench answers inside the shift.

Transit: Oil Analyzers Inc. FAQ · lab turnaround and 24 h dispatch guidance: Noria / Machinery Lubrication. No end-to-end draw-to-result study is published.

84% → ~20%

Assets in severe alarm under default limits in one published program, against the ~20% practitioners call manageable.

Williams, Walsh & Garvey (Ametek Spectro Scientific), Precision Lubrication — one example program and a practitioner rule of thumb, not a standard. ASTM D7720 sets no ceiling.

30–50% → 18–33%

RPVOT reproducibility between labs against repeatability within one. Staying on one bench keeps you on the tighter term — 1.7× by the standard’s own equations, not 5×.

ASTM D2272-22 §12.3 — r = 0.053·X^1.23, R = 0.09·X^1.23, evaluated over 200–2,000 min. Specialists report 30–50% in practice; one round robin at 39% (Fluitec, 2010).

10DEPLOYMENT & OPENNESS

Open by design. Deployed your way.

Closed vendor worlds on one side. Browser, open egress, and a flat per-lab license on the other.

CLOSED WORLD
  • Windows desktop apps and LAN-bound middleware

  • Hard device caps; media-pack onboarding

  • Exports capped; intelligence paywalled by tier

  • History held by the lab or lubricant contract

OPEN
  • Browser + mobile anywhere; zero Windows footprint.

  • Open egress: REST, CSV, schema-published JSON exports, scheduled SFTP drops, one CMMS webhook.

  • Brand-neutral — not tied to a lubricant supplier or a lab contract; your history is yours and exportable.

  • Cloud today, self-hosted next — sovereignty without giving up the analytics.

  • Licensing principle: flat per lab — never per instrument, never per adapter, no device cap.

RESTCSVASM JSONSFTPCMMS webhook

11THE 10-MINUTE LIVE DEMO

The 10-minute live demo — it’s a script, not a promise

A live walkthrough of the real product. Timing is a script, not an SLA.

1 · Claim

type the printed code

2 · Register

a sample, print QR

3 · Run

watch D445 stream live

4 · Certificate

appears on completion

5 · Breach

a doped run fires

6 · Explain

the alarm names its rule

7 · Prove

open the QC chart

WHY WE WIN

Glass-box oil condition monitoring.

Every alarm names its rule. Every forecast ships a confidence band. Where the data can’t support a number, the screen says so.

  • Honest boundary: in a published plant assessment, oil analysis and vibration agreed only 27% of the time — we are the orthogonal channel, not a vibration replacement.

  • AI posture: analytics are physics-grounded and validated; commentary is drafted — an analyst signs.

Ask them for their model’s validation report. Then ask us.

Book a live demo

Tell us where to reach you. We’ll set up a live walkthrough of VeroOCM.

*Your information is secure and will only be used to respond to your inquiry.